Adler Firm, PLLC
Free Consultation - Call 24/7

Lawmakers accuse disability judges of approving too many claims

This week on Capitol Hill, several Social Security Administration judges defended themselves against allegations that they are approving too many disability claims. Administration law judges decide appeals of disability claims that have been denied at least once in the past.

According to a report from a committee of Republicans in the House of Representatives, 191 of the roughly 1,400 judges employed by the SSA had an approval rate of more than 85 percent in the cases they decided between 2005 and 2013.

The four judges who were called to testify at a hearing before the committee denied the report’s claim that they “rubber stamp” disability applications. Instead, they said that they consider each case for its individual merits. One of the judges approved 99 percent of the claims before him between 2005 and 2013. He said he personally sees the pain that the applicants are in before approving the appeal claims.

Another judge who reportedly has an approval average of 95 percent said the reason he overturns so many denials is likely because he is trained in the law while the lower-level reviewers are not.

What isn’t exactly clear is what the administrative law judges would stand to gain from approving undeserving disability claims. The House committee’s report claims that some of the judges approved claims as a way to clear up the hefty backlog of cases that are in the system.

However, the judges also know first-hand that the disability funds are tight and could run out within the next decade if action isn’t taken, so it’s unlikely that the judges would be granted benefits too liberally.

Instead of attacking judges, it is perhaps a better idea to look at societal factors and other issues that could be affecting the increased number of disability beneficiaries.

For example, with the baby boomer generation aging, many workers have sustained illnesses or injuries making it impossible for them to work, but they can’t yet qualify for retirement.

Additionally, more women than ever are members of the workforce, which increases the potential pool of disability beneficiaries significantly.

Ultimately, as a law firm that helps individuals apply for disability benefits and appeal denials, we know that judges are not merely rubber-stamping claims. Instead, applicants must clearly meet the requirements to qualify for benefits.

Source: Associated Press, “Report: Social Security judges rubber-stamp claims," Stephen Ohlemacher, June 10, 2014

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Request A Free Consultation

Representing Michigan injured workers since 1979.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Traverse City Office
13561 S West Bay Shore Drive
Suite 301
Traverse City, MI 49684

Toll Free: 888-873-7173
Fax: 231-943-2299
Map & Directions

Farmington Hills Office
30300 Northwestern Highway
Suite 304
Farmington Hills, MI 48334

Map & Directions

Adler Firm, PLLC